AGYNEXA
Enterprise knowledge with its context and sources
Information spread across policies, contracts, reports, and databases makes a single question a search across teams and systems. Finding a document may still leave the employee unsure whether its version is current or its rule applies to the case.
The details that turn an idea into something you can build.
How the solution is built
We establish approved sources, access rights, and content versions, then design retrieval around organizational terminology. Retrieved material is tied to the question's context, and each attributable result points to the source supporting it.
When work requires relationships, such as a supplier linked to a contract, invoice, and request, we evaluate entities and relationships alongside text. Context can then be followed across records while preserving references to the originals.
Start with a source register: document owner, approved version, access group and review date. The retrieval design must preserve those boundaries when a document is split, indexed or summarized. A useful answer lets the employee inspect the relevant passage and recognize when the available sources cannot settle the question.
What the team uses
An employee can ask about a process, compare clauses, or prepare a briefing from permitted material. Source facts, system inferences, and unresolved details remain distinct. Conflicting sources and versions are shown rather than blended into a confident answer.
In a fictional example, an employee asks about onboarding a supplier. The output identifies requirements in the current policy and their sources, information missing from the supplier file, and who needs to resolve an exception. It does not invent a financial threshold or approval.
Access and updates
Retrieval respects user and organizational scope before sending information to the model. The project defines reindexing, outdated-content handling, and removal after access expires. Conversations do not become approved company policies.
What we test
Known-answer questions, conflicting documents, an old source, an out-of-scope question, and unauthorized access attempts. We evaluate citation correctness, answer completeness, and handling of missing evidence, together with latency and cost.
Delivery scope
A source and access inventory, retrieval architecture, question/result interface, evaluation cases, and update guidance. System connections, retention, and processing location follow the project's scope.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Start where the work gets stuck.
Describe one request as it arrives today. Make its next step clearer.